Skip to content


eminent domain

while i was offline last week in LA, the supreme court validated what we already sort of knew: the right to own property, the most fundamental tenet of free market capitalism, is truly a right only so long as some really wealthy bastard doesn’t come along and want the property himself. the supreme court ruled that property can be seized by private developers who grease the wheels of democracy with kickbacks and bribes. and no, i am not being facetious here. all they have to do is demonstrate that their development will make more money for the city than your puny house, and the city government can greenlight the caterpillars.
in response, some guy after my own heart is making the moves to tear down supreme court justice david souter’s house and build a hotel on the lot. GENIUS!!!

Posted in General.

2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. gimaha said

    Look at who made this dicision: Kennedy, Souter, Bader-Ginsburg and Breyer…………..The old conservatives went against this. Read the opinions. What a shame!

Continuing the Discussion

  1. online forex trading linked to this post on 10.11.2005

    online forex trading

    online forex trading In the following hosanna the second-thoughts and arquebus-bullets of Japan, Great Britain and

Some HTML is OK

(required)

(required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.